|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
||||||
Mi Casa May Not Be Su Casa |
The MEC’s research revealed that the terms used to describe different types of development are not well understood. According to the study, as the state moves into a more widespread practice of community planning, there can be communications problems between planners and homebuyers:
Mi Casa May Not Be Su Casa Continued on Page 4 |
|
||||
At the center of land use issues are the homebuyers, whose values and preferences should be the driving force behind how land use decisions are made. Here, we turn the spotlight on two organizations that are focusing on homebuyers’ opinions and attempting to educate them about alternatives.
|
|
|||||
When Planners Say… |
They Mean… |
And Homebuyers Hear…. |
|
|||
Livable Communities |
Neighborhoods with a mix of businesses and residences, as well as open spaces and transportation options. |
Something vague, like |
|
|||
Freedom, which is expressed as the desire for privacy, quiet, and a choice of where and how to live;
Security, expressed as keeping one’s family safe from crime; Desire to secure a high quality of life for one’s family, expressed as convenience, diversity, and knowing one’s neighbors; and Aesthetics, described as a desire to be near nature, parks, rivers, and lakes, as well as a dislike of “cookie-cutter” housing developments.
|
|
|||||
High Density Development |
Compact, walkable community design that reduces strains on public infrastructure like sewer, water, and roads. |
Overcrowded neighborhoods |
|
|||
Protecting Green Space |
Clustering development to reduce fragmentation of open spaces. |
Widely spaced housing avoiding dense development |
|
|||
Walkable Communities |
Places where homes, workplaces, and amenities are in close proximity. |
Good news! Places where homes, workplaces, and |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
___________________________________ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Project Spotlight |
In Kent County, the United Growth for Kent County project is distributing a Directory of Kent County Land Use Organizations in an effort to promote media coverage of the important issues addressed by the Council’s report and the work already being done by Kent County organizations.
As your own efforts continue, consider reading the 100-page report in full. Organized around the four major categories of land use urban revitalization, land resource based industries, planning and development regulation, and infrastructure and community services it contains 160 recommendations designed to address the long-term consequences of unplanned, unmanaged growth and its impact on both the environment and the economy of Michigan. Several members of the PAL Advisory Group who served on the council played key roles in shaping the council’s recommendations: Jim Barrett, Jim Brooks, Keith Charters, Gordon Guyer, Lana Pollack, Hans Voss, Heaster Wheeler, and Gil White.
Grantee Updates Coming Soon! |
|
||
Now that the report of the Michigan Land Use Leadership Council has been submitted to the governor and legislature, the real work begins. PAL encourages grantees to build awareness about the report and continue the statewide conversation about its recommendations. People in your community who understand the issues need to continue the work to translate the Council’s recommendations into action at the state and local level. Here’s just a sample of some ongoing activities supporting the Council’s report:
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
___________________________________ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
PAL Profile
He firmly believes in private property rights. “The right to |